EARTH in Space and Time.

Again there are two views, but there's only A SINGLE SET OF EVIDENCE!

1. THE SCIENCE VIEW: This is ALL that is taught in schools, written of in all print, and shown in all media. 
2. THE CREATION VIEW: This is the Biblical Rendering, holding GOD as The Creator Power

1A: Science says -- NOTHING came together, and, was located in one singular point in time and space,     perhaps no larger  than a spot, or even one atom. Yet due to it's compression level, it was super, super dense, and this caused it to explode, sending all that eventually became all that we see, in the Universe. Time frame? About 15 Billion Years Ago!

Well, That's a huge leap of faith, that's required to accept this, right? IF nothing came together, how can there be something? How can any gravitational field be generated, by nothing? Then we have nothing becoming something.  SOMETHING that was super dense, that led to its exploding!

• how can nothing create a magnetic field?
• how can nothing, become something super dense?

2A: "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth." Genesis 1:1, so I ask you, in the basic,'What's
        the difference between the two expressed views? In both nothing became all that we see, right?  Would you agree, that only a power humans attribute to God, could take nothing, to create something?

1. Science: This "Big Bang", is still the reason why the Universe is still expanding, but in any explosion, stuff flies in all directions, more of less in a uniform pattern. Get a 'water-balloon', climb onto a ladder, and drop it on your driveway, and see that same level of uniformity!

     However, neither materials, nor gases, nor galaxies, nor anything, in the Cosmos, shows any patterns of uniformity, but rather, clumps and clusters, with huge open spaces of nothing in between!  Again science has no answer!  But take what science says are "The Natural Laws of Science" under which all things in the Universe, are controlled or governed by.


     Now which came first? The natural laws, or the nothing somehow coming together? Yes, much like the chicken and the egg, right? {The chicken came fully able to lay her eggs} However, we must first look at the night sky, and take notice of the obvious order of what we see.We, all have the wisdom to know, we can't detonate a huge explosion, in a junkyard, and expect to get in and drive off in a brand new Rolls Royce, that was the result, agree? So how does science answer this? They change the subject!

    Why, do we now know, of hundreds of moons, many in orbits around a planet, yet some move with their host's rotations while others are in retrograde orbit, moving in the opposite direction. Ditto for some entire galaxies! Science says, the super dot, was spinning, when it went "bang" therefore every thing spins in the same direction, but we know that's false! The forces required to have nearly half of Jupiter's moons, in a retrograde orbits, is more than enough to turn the moon into dust! Let alone getting a whole galaxy to be spinning in the opposite directions to the majority of galaxies! Again Science refuses to give answer.

    "The Goldy Locks Principal"; This little spec, this blue marble, is within the so-called Goldy Locks area, in space, in relations to other bodies with our Solar System! Here's why:

•    IF-- earth was not on an angle, in respect to its axis, earth would be a dessert all around the equater regions N and S!
• IF-- earth was but 10% of its average distance, closer to the Sun, our surface would be nearly as that of Venus, just a little cooler, thus lead would not melt.
• IF-- earth was but 15% farther from the Sun, earth would be as the S. Pole, of today.
• IF-- earth was but a little smaller, we would be as Mars, unable to retain liquid water.
• IF-- our Moon, were as the average size of only our Solar system, earth's orbit would wobble and wander, giving us crazy seasons at best.
• IF-- our Moon was 1/2 as far, further away, or 1/2 it size, see above and add, loss of tides thus no flushing of any tidal flats, which are our ocean's nurseries, as they become stagnant, nonproductive.
• IF-- our Sun was but 15% larger or smaller, or father or nearer, all of the above ills would not allow for live as we know it!
• IF- - Earth, The Sun and, the Moon, were NOT, in their present locations, at their present sizes, then full solar or lunar eclipses would not occur, and our knowledge of all three would be limited.
• IF--- and this is a big one, if the earth/moon where not in the physical bounds of each, then earth's core would not be liquid, therefore no magnetic field produced, thus all life would be bombarded by the Sun's radiation!
• NOW THAT'S ONLY 9 REASONS I CAN THINK OF, WHY WE SHOULD BE THANKFUL, THAT WE ARE NOT THE RESULTS OF A HAPPY ACCIDENTAL CO-INCIDENCE!

     That's just far to much, far to many good news points, to be placed only on luck. If any think this is only luck, you should be in Vegas!

     No, friends, all this came about because of a meticulous plan, by Some One Who knew True Science, and the cause and effect of all things, as well as their interaction. In other words, Intelligent Creator!
 
    In closing, look and compare the order of Creation in Genesis, and the order Science says every thing came to be, and you'll see it is all in total opposition, yet we must ask, which came first "The Natural Law", the Universe, or the Creator of both?  In Biblical Hebrew the word eternity means, " From forever to forever" and God is eternal, man is not!

    Finally, can science or any scientist, create life, without cloning, without pro-creation, or able to give self or you eternal life? MY GOD can!
servant@frontier,com   John