THE BATTLES OF THE BIBLES...PART 2.
So far you have learned that this Battle, an ongoing one, is still very much in play, and it is focused on but on both ends of two streams.
The one upon which the King James Version is founded, has just over 1,900 old manuscripts, plus many surviving personal letters between the early Church fathers, in which they have, Thanks be to God, written many verses, back and forth! Many of these verses can NOT be found within the other' s Bible stream, of which there are but only two, one found in a Sinai cave, in a pile of garbage, the other near Alexandria Egypt, both found by a German scholar in 1844 A.D!
Thus those who uphold this Bible of Rome, want us to believe that God hid His True Word, more than 1,800 years After. . .men received copies from present day Syria and Lebanon?
Written by:
THE DEAD SEA SCROLLS:
Written by the Essences, a Jewish Sect, living by themselves, apart from their fellow man, where Cabalistically inclined, yet the match the King James Version, Revised Edition (1880's +/-) very much, sadly the New Revised version has more in common with Rome's version!
Yes many argue, that they are not complete, and that's true, the most complete is the Book of Isaiah, and the fact the Book of Ruth is gone. Yet what's there, matches the K.J.V almost 100%, thus proving that during all this time, God's Word remained unchanged!
GNOSTIC GOSPELS [Time Magazine Dec22, 2003} Release date totally innocent? @ Xmas?
"Words from the past"? Forty six scriptures, in Egypt in 1945 A.D. Claims to have changed the views of early Christianity, but have they? Please remember that Egypt was Pagan, and leaned solidly on the Occult, in fact the Library in Alexandra held the world's largest single collection of all things Occult, which is why the early Christians were accused of setting it ablaze yet the people who endorse these Gnostic papers would have you and me, believe that they were written by and buried by the early Church fathers, obviously Christians? Does that make any sense to you, readers?
They are SUPPOSEDLY, the new Gospels of Thomas, of Peter and even of Judas, the betrayer of Christ!
{I wonder when he was able to write all this while he was with our Lord for 3.5 years, because he committed suicide before, Jesus died on the Cross!}
WRITTEN BY: Edomites and Marcionites, Gnostic and Thomasines, each and every one of them believe that man is divine thus a god! Plus all hold to the non-exclusiveness of Jesus Christ, now those who have been for 30 years pushing the ecumenical line, also believe in the very same things! Do YOU still wonder of the why? These so-called 'gospels' just happened to be found at this time as well?
The "gospel" of Peter?
"The Cross talked. And walked! Jesus had died the day before, uttering his last words "My Power, O power, you have left he behind!" His body was taken down and placed in the tomb. But now the Sabbath dawned (* N.B.*), a great voice came from the sky, and two men descended. The stone blocking the tomb rolled away of its own accord (*NB 2*), while Roman soldiers gaped."Three men emerge(d) from the tomb, two of them supporting the other, with a Cross following behind. The heads of the two reached up to the sky, but the one they were leading went up to the skies. (*NB*3) And they heard a voice, "Have you preached to those who are sleeping"? And a reply came from the Cross, "Yes"
NB= oops which Religion began to worship their God on the First day rather than the 7th day, the Venerable day of the SUN? ROME Daniel 7:25. Are you not the least bit suspicious of a late finding to support Catholicity? Please know history, Alexandria and Rome kept Sunday as holy, but the rest still kept the Lord's Holy day as Friday sunset to Saturday's sunset, the Sabbath belongs to the LORD!
Mark 2:28 . "Therefore the Son of man is Lord also of the sabbath".
NB2 = The King James says an angel rolled the stone away!
Matthew 28:2. "And, behold, there was a great earthquake: for the angel of the Lord descended from heaven, and came and rolled back the stone from the door, and sat upon it."
NB3= John 20:17. "Jesus saith unto her, Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my Father: but go to my brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and to my God, and your God."
Ephesians 4:9 . '(Now that he ascended, what is it but that he also descended first into the lower parts of the earth?"
NOTE: All this means He was buried in the earth, death means dead, the breath of life which God gives has been removed and taken back to He who created it! The dead are dead! Until resurrected unto salvation or damnation, only AFTER Christ's Return, for the Just, and 1,000 years latter for the unjust, to be destroyed! Yet sad is it not, that this lie produces yet many more lies, in order to prove the initial lie? Oh what a web we weave, when? Please read Matthew 24 when those with Jesus asked about signs? HE said, "Let no man deceive you" twice more and referred to deceptions 2x more in just this chapter! Jesus knew all this would come!Yet Rome lifts prayers to, and for the dead, as do a few others, but at death the books for one's name is closed, they are dead, no longer able to be good nor evil, even Mary and David are still in the earth!
Finally please note the Cross, that speaks, that walks, and was buried with Christ, NONE of which has one grain of truth in it! Now who makes a big deal out of the Cross, with or with a human figure hanging on it?
So in my humble way of thinking, these belong where the Sinai line was found, IN THE TRASH!
So let's go to the Sinai, and to the Monastery of St. Catherine, within this place's trash heap these manuscripts, upon which ALL the latest translations, since 1900 were based upon! In one of the rooms, behind a wire mesh fence, you can see the skulls of all the monks who died there, and you can pray to them as per the sign, and you'll receive a blessing! (How can a detached skull answer when there's no breath in them"?} Within this church, you'll find all the pagan and occult signs of sun, with both straight and curved 'rays, showing both male and female respectively, moon, the crescent moon, and stars.
SINAI LIBRARY {one of their Signs}
The Library of the Monastery of Sinai, famed throughout the world, (you ever heard of it?) houses a highly significant collection of manuscripts, a number of papyri, early printed books, and archives. Besides the impressive number of handwritten codices that are preserved, the collection is known for the signal diversity of languages, that are represented, and the diverse hands one encounters. Apart from the Greek manuscripts, which make up the majority, the library contains valuable numbers of manuscripts in Arabic, Syriac, Georgian and Slavic, and others in Armenian, Latin, Persian, Polish, and Ethiopian. All witness to the long existence of the Monastery, and the varied spiritual contacts with other peoples, which the Monastery maintained together with their existing dependencies.
CODEX SINAITICUS {In their own Words}
"The Codex Sinaiticus, dates back to the middle of the 4th century, and possibly one of fifty copies of the Holy Scriptures sent Constantine the Great, by Eusebius of Caesarea. Thus these manuscripts likely donated to the Monastery of Sinai at its foundation, where it was preserved until the middle of the nineteenth century, by the German scholar Constantine Tischendorf on his visit in 1844 and 1859. the first folios he took, he presented them to the University of Leipzig .The rest he gave to the Emperor of Russia. Folios he had received as a loan so that they might be published. Secured with lying promises to the monks. In Russia they remained until 1933, when they were sold by the Soviet Union to the British Library in London, where they are to this day.. In 1975 certain folios of the codex came to light, among the new finds in the Tower of St. George. The monks of Sinai have never ceased in their justified requests for the return of their Codex.
HOW DID THESE MONKS FARE IN THE ISLAMIC WORLD?
AHDNAME:
The benevolent treatment of the Monastery of Sinai by the Arabs, who took the peninsula in the seventh century (600 ad) , is due to the Patient of Mohamed and its protection with rights and privileges, which prophet Mohamed, founder of Islam granted to the monks of the Monastery of Mount Sinai in the second year of the Hegra (623). This together with other writs of privilege, which were given by the Caliphs and Sultans from the twelfth to the nineteenth centuries, contributed to the establishment of monastic life at Sinai and its environs ass that time. and through its dependencies to the rest of the world."
NOTE: Does this not mean that Islam has no quarrel with the church of Rome? Do they not both use occult symbols? YES! Please know these facts, Mohamed could not read nor write, as most did not, but he married an EX-NUN, who was versed in Latin and Aramaic, and she wrote what he spoke about! NOW please put on your thinking cap!
Also know that Napoleon Bonaparte, a high degree Mason, as was his brother ruling Spain, also protected them!
Plus at this site, 1,000's have prayed at a bush, said to many 1,000's of years old, due to the claim of it being the very same bush, surviving without humans watering it, ever since Moses bowed down to this so-called very same burning bush! {Although a closer look you will see pipes for ?}
Exodus 3:2. "And the angel of the LORD appeared unto him in a flame of fire out of the midst of a bush: and he looked, and, behold, the bush burned with fire, and the bush was not consumed."
Note: please remember these are the same folks that RECYCLED Pagan Roman statuary and renamed them St. Peter (Apollo) as but one example.
Von Dobshutz, "The INFLUENCE of the BIBLE": P.136.
"Wherever the so-called Counter Reformation, started by the Jesuits, gained hold of the people, the vernacular was suppressed and the Bible kept from the laity. So eager were the Jesuits to destroy the authority of the Bible-- the paper pope of the Protestants, as they contemptuously called it--- that they even did not refrain from criticizing it genuineness and historical value."
Note: Look around you today, and can you be surprised by the lack of Biblical Illiteracy today? Or the simple fact of lack of manners and honesty? When there's been and still is an outright war against the Bible, by those hold Human Traditions above and beyond even their own "Custom - Made Bible?"
"OUR AUTHORIZED BIBLE VINDICATED". Benjamin G. Wilkinson Leaves of Autumn Books 1995
"Before the English people could go the way of the continent and he brought to question their great English Bible, the course of their thinking must be changed. Much had to be done to discredit, in their eyes, the Reformation-- its history, doctrines, and documents.. which they looked upon as a great work of God. This task was accomplished by those who, while working under cover, Passed as friends. In what numbers the Jesuits were at hand to bring this about, the following words, from one qualified to know will reveal:"
"Despite all the persecution the (the Jesuits) have met the have not abandoned England, where there are a greater number of Jesuits than in Italy; there are Jesuits in all classes of society; in Parliament; among the English clergy; among the Protestant laity, even in the higher stations. I could not comprehend how a Jesuit could be a Protestant priest, or how a Protestant priest could be a Jesuit; but my Confessor silenced my scruples by telling me, omnia munda mundis, and that St Paul became a Jew, that he might save the Jews;l it was no wonder, therefore, if a Jesuit should feign himself a Protestant, for the conversion of Protestants. But pay attention, I entreat you, to discover concerning the nature of the religious movement in England termed PUSEYISM".
Note: Look at all the closed English churches and think they have not won this battle? Think we are not involved in this as well?
OK, you say, So What? Well lets show a few examples of how even a small word used or deleted, can mean a huge difference, agree?
1 Timothy 3:16. "And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory."
1 Timothy 3:16 as N.A. renders it: " God was manifest in the flesh" as..."He was manifest in the flesh".
Note: Who is this HE in the N.A. version? Could by your uncle George, right?
1 Timothy 6:14-15. "That thou keep this commandment without spot, unrebukeable, until the appearing of our Lord Jesus Christ: Which in his times he shall shew, who is the blessed and only Potentate, the King of kings, and Lord of lords;" [K. J. V.]
N.I.V= used and adds the the word "GOD" twice in vs.15, thus removing Jesus Christ, from the picture, in title and His place!
John 3:13. "And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven, even the Son of man which is in heaven"
N.I.V deletes..."which is in heaven." Yet is found in the manuscripts they claim are truth. Their witnesses are P66 and P75Sinaiticus, Vaticanus, and 8 further manuscripts! Thus they just plainly lie!
Acts 2:30. "Therefore being a prophet, and knowing that God had sworn with an oath to him, that of the fruit of his loins, according to the flesh, he would raise up Christ to sit on his throne;"
N.J.V. "But he was a prophet and knew that God had promised him an oath that he would place one of his descendants on his throne"
NOTE: does this not strike you than God had promised one of His children to set by Him, there's no hint of Christ ever being a father, as He was not married that would mean He broke the commandments [His own] thus could not be our ransom for sin! One more change, from 100's!
Ephesians 3:9. "And to make all men see what is the fellowship of the mystery, which from the beginning of the world hath been hid in God, who created all things by Jesus Christ:"
N.I.V. deleted the "...who created all things by Jesus Christ.". This also omitted in the N.A "New American", as well as most other "modern" translations, because they are done done and supervised by the Friends of Jesus Society, the Jesuits!
Doctrines and Dates Authorized
Sunday Sabbath 321-363 Council of Laodicea
Relic Worship 327 A.D, the worship of idols, and bits of body parts of saints they elevated.
Rosary 366 A.D. All eastern religions used then 100's of years prior.
Mass 394 A.D. They believe the wafer and gold whatchama[ HOST] call it it the body of Christ
Crucified over and over each time!
Eternal Torment 590 A.D.
Indulgences 799 A.D. one could per Rome, prepay for one's sins, or hurry a loved one from torment
[I'll pay you 2 day for my sins tomorrow!]
Confessional 1198A.D. if Infallible why. 800 YRS, after start-up for this question?
Bible Forbidden 1299 A.D. OK, a religion without a Bible, is this NOT a pencil without a point?
Infant Baptism 1311A.D. when do humans reach the age of accountability, at birth?
Tradition above Scripture 1563 A.D. this speaks for itself, agree?
Limbo ?? Where an unbaptized baby went at death
Purgatory ?? Not quite hell,but one received punishments for unknown time B 4 heaven.
Fish on Fridays ? 1500's ? as livestock became more common people ate less fish, those who made
who made their living fishing had their priest petition Rome, thus fish Fridays!
If we line these doctrines up against Mithraism, the ancient Babylonian times we will find a very close fit!Plus the tonsured and celibate priest and nuns, sprinkling baptisms, teachings on death and immortality of the soul, power over the dead via prayers and relics, vain repetitions with beads during prayers, are ALL part and parcel directly from Babylon and NOT the Holy Bible!
Now you know the why of Daniels "Little Horn" and of Revelation beast in the which it gets is power from the Dragon who in Rev.12"9 is clearly shown to be Satan, Lucifer, the dragon the devil, with whom they have cast their lot! So can we call the top leaders Lucifurians? YES! Sadly many of the laity are in total ignorance of any of this, I hope & pray!
AGAIN for all earth's religions to come together ecumenically, Jesus Christ MUST be placed only as an equal to all other human made gods!
Revelation 18:4 And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.
DESCANTES: was a Priest at Rome, Professor of Theology, official Theological Censor of the Inquisition, who wrote this in: "Popery and the Jesuits in Rome," pp. 128,134 as quoted in Welsh, "Secret History of Oxford Movement" ,p33
:The English clergy were formerly too much attached to their Articles of Faith to be shaken from them. You might have employed in vain the machines set in motion by Bossuet and the Jansenitets of France {Note: two systems behind the French Revolution and the 'Age of Reason' madness for 3.5 yrs afterwards that burned all Bibles & killed many a priest] to reunite them to the Romish Church: ans so that the Jesuits of England tried another plan. This was to demonstrate from history one ecclesiastical antiquity the legitimacy of the usages of the English Church, whence, through the exertions of the Jesuits concealed among its clergy, might arise a studious attention to Christian antiquity., This was designed to occupy the clergy in long, laborious, and obtrusive investigation, and to alienate them from their Bibles."
Tracarianism [ 1833-1841]
"Romism is known to have recently entered the church of England in the disguise of Oxford Tractarianism;(*NB) to have drawn off no inconsiderable number of her clergy and members; and to have gained a footing on British soil. from which the government and public opinion together are unable to reject her."
(*NB) Oxford' s movement of 90 tracts of doctrines and practices to turn the Church of England back early Catholic Doctrines' If you have seen the REBUILT St. Paul's Cathedral in London it now looks as a smaller version of St.Peters in the Vatican! The Anglican Church, never far removed in doctrines from Rome are now only ONE!
NEWMAN, "APLOGIA', P 225
NEWMAN [LEADER of the Oxford movement who later went over to the Church of Rome] wrote in 1841 to a Roman Catholic,
"Only through the English Church can you act upon the English nation. I wish, of course, our church should be consolidated, and in your communion, for its sake, and your sake, and for the sake of unity.
He and his associates believed that Protestantism was Antichrist! {This was the exact opposite of ALL the Reformers who all held the Pope to be the Antichrist, the Instead of Jesus!} But that is par for the course of Satan, to copy all things of God, but in reverse!
J.E. Bowden, "Life of F.W. Faber" p192 [1886]
Faber, one of the associates of Newman in the Oxford Movement, himself a brilliant writer, said: Protestantism is perishing: what is good in its by God's mercy being gathered into the garners of Rome.... My whole life, God willing, shall be one crusade against the detestable and diabolical heresy of Protestantism"
NOTE: If you look at the man centered messages of today's American churches, instead of Christ centered sermons, you'll know that the above statement is near truth today!
Walter Walsh, "Secret History of the Oxford Movement" p202
PUSEY [from whom the term PUSAYISM was coined} a well known member of the Oxform Movement and author of "Minor Prophets" and Daniel the Prophet {His comments of the Bible's books of the same name] said:
" I believe Antichrist will be infidel, and arise out of what calls itself Protestantism, and the Rome and England will be untied in one to oppose it."
Note: How does one stand in opposition of self?
Revelation 13:18. "Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six." K.J.V.
NEW Revised: " And his number is six hundred and sixteen." {in the margin, not in the text]
Satan will always nix a little lie or error with truth, just enough to deceive as you can see between these two versions In the Older K.J.V. we have 6,6,6 but in the new we have 616
NOTE: "...count the number.." Most know that letters have a number value in Latin, in the Greek {Lateinos] and Hebren {Romith} all three are identical in letters to numerical values. Also many know the Pontiffs are crowned as VICARIOUS FILLI DIE or VICAR OF GOD, right? In the Triple Crown, [no longer on display] these very words were cast into it,
V.............. 5 F............... 0 D..........500
I................ 1 I................. 1 E......... 0
C............100 L................50 I...............1
A............... 0 I...................1 ------------
R................0 ----------- 501
I............... 1 53 53
U ............. 5
S............. 0 112
112................................................666.
Joseph F. Berg "The Great Aposticy" p. 156-158 sums this up as
" Now we challenge the world to find another name in these languages: Greek, Hebrew, and Latin, which shall designate the same number."
SO who are HORT AND WESTCOTT?
Hort ans well as Westcott rejected the the idea of infallibility of the Bible, and Hort called the doctrine of the substitutionary atonement "Immoral". Westcott denied the historicity of Genesis 1- through 3 and Hort praised Darwin and denied the divinity of Christ . {that's Arianism the very charge Rome used against the 3 uprooted powers! [Daniel 7:20,24.}
Note: Their ideas, beliefs and doctrines they put forth are so identical to the Jesuits, that many suppose that's what and who they were!
Hort's View on Evolution:
LIFE. pp 430-431.
"The beginning of an individual is precisely as inconceivable as the beginning of a species... It certainly startles me to find you saying that you have seen no facts which supports such a view as Darwin's. But it seems to me the most probable manner of development, and the reflections suggested by his book drove me to the conclusion that some kind of developments must be supposed."
Note: Is this not also the official views of the Vatican by the Infallible one?
1860 Nov. 9th Hort to MacMillan: Ibid
"Another last word on Darwin,, I shall not let the subject drop in a hurry, or to speak more correctly. It will not let me drop. It has completely thrown me back into natural science, not that I had ever abandoned it either in intention, or all together in practice. But now there is no getting rid of it any mare that of a part of oneself."
Note: to see or read All such letters www.amazingdiscoveriies.org /library Battle of the Bibles. yet here is showing what Hort thought of the "Texus Receptus" the Received Text upon which the Protestant Bibles were based!
Life Vol.1.p.211
1851 Dec.20th Hort to John Ellerton" "I had no idea till the last few weeks of the importance of texts, having read so little Greek Testament and dragged on with the villainous Texus Receptus. Think of that vile Texus Receptus leaning entirely on late MSS: it is a blessing there are such early ones."
Note: MSS manuscripts are those found in 1845 by the German scholar, Tischendorf, in a trash heap.
April 19th Hort to rev. John Ellerton:
"One resutl of our talk I may as well tell you. He {Wescott] and I are going to edit a Greek text of the New Testament some two or three years hence, if possible. Lachmann and Tischendorf will supply rich materials, but not nearly enough: and we hope to do a good deal with Oriental versions. OUR object is to supply clergymen generally, schools, etc, with portable Greek texts which shall not be disfigured with Byzantine corruptions"
NOTE: It is from the workings and efforts of these two that we have the N.I.V the New American Standard ect all of which have removed both the Divinity and the position of Jesus Christ, in order to proceed with the ecumenical movements of religious equality among all human religions! A Religio- Stew!
LIFE. vol.1 pp.228,229. "I feel most keenly the disgrace of circulating what I feel to be falsified copies of Holy Scripture{ a reference to the A.V.?] and I am most anxious to provide something to replace them. This cannot be any text resting solely on our judgement, even if we were not too inexperienced to make one: but it must be supported by a clear and obvious preponderance of evidence. The margin will give ample scope for our own ingenuity or principles... my with would be to leave the popular received test except where it is clearly wrong."
Note: "..EXCEPT WHERE IT IS CLEARLY WRONG" in his own NOT so Humble opinion, of course!
Note: Please note the condensed meaning, do not change it greatly but only in really important places and then we use the margins to show the old errors. Only two scholars where James 2nd used a total of four teems of 5, and each team's efforts were then passed to the next team to check, thus the whole Bible was checked out a total of 5 times. and still there's a few errors such as "Sick hanker chiefs" {Acts19:12]
Look at the next letter, which Hort left copies of these to his son, who latter had them published, much to the chagrin of Hort.
Ibid ., Vol 1.p211 The statement which immediatly follows Hort' s describing the sacred test as "VILE" is most revealing:
"Wescott, Gorham, C.H. Scott, Benson, Bradshaw, Laurd, ect, and I have stared a society for the investigation of ghosts and all supernatural appearances, and effects, being all disposed to believe that such things really exist , and aught to be discriminated from hoaxes and mere subjective delusions; we shall be happy to obtain any good accounts well authenticated with names. Westcott is drawing up a schedule of questions. Cope calls us the Cock and Bull Club, our own temporary name is the "Ghostly guild"!
Note: In addition to changing the Holy Scriptures, they are also getting into spiritism, which comes from Lucifer!
Acts 8:9. "But there was a certain man, called Simon, which beforetime in the same city used sorcery, and bewitched the people of Samaria, giving out that himself was some great one:"
"'In 1882 the Society for Psychical Research was founded. IN effect it was a combination of those groups already working independently in the investigation of spiritualism and other psychic phenomena [telepathy, clairvoyance,, ect].{note this is as the ancient occult wisdom.-jb] Of these the most important was centered round Henry Sidgwick, Frederic Myers and Edmund Gurney, all Fellows of Trinity Collage, Cambridge, and deriving its inspiration from their Cambridge University Ghost Society, founded by no less a person than Edward White Benson, the future Archbishop of Canterbury. {Thus head of the Anglican Church...jb}
Note: NOW, can you see why Rome and England are once more joined as one?
NOTE: This society is also in control of the Esoteric Society of today! They are those who claim to communicate to the spirit world, and this is for the last 20 years all over the media, right? Speaking to the dead! Whom the Bible says "Know not anything"!
W.H. SALTER, "THE SOCIETY FOR PSYCHICAL RESEARCH: [S.P.R.]An Outline of Its History, London 1948. pp.5,6.as per the Son A. C. BENSON of E.W. Benson Archbishop.
"Among my father's diversions at Cambridge was the foundation of a "Ghost Society" the forerunner of the Psychical Society [meaning the S.P. R.] for the investigation of the supernatural. Lightfoot, Westcott and Hort were among the members. He was then, as always, more interested in psychical phenomena than he cared to admit."
"lightfoot and Westcott both became Bishops, and Hort Professor of Divinity. The S.P.R. has hardly lived up to the standard of ecclesiastic eminence set by the parent society" It's the S.P.R. that controls all the New Age stuff, of channeling ,and all their other stuff of the occult.
NOTE: that's a pedigree to make Satan proud! So where is all this stuff heading towards?
Elliot Miller, 1989, "Crash Course on the New Age," Baker Book Housed.
"The evolution from traditional mediumship to contemporary channeling has been gradual. The original spiritualism had its start in 1848 Organizations like the Society for Psychical research in Britain were formed.. When Russian born Helena Pertrovna Blatsky founded Theosophy in 1875, the slow transition towards modern channeling began., her two chief works, Isis Unveiled and The Secret Doctrine laid the foundation for modern New Age belief system."
NOTE: P. B. Blatsky, is the one who wrote, Lucifer is the LOGOS THE WORD, THE LIGHT!
He is the ONE who won the battle at Calvary! Satan SA-TAN is the Light Bearer, the COSMIC CHRIST, but all the secret societies, higher echelons, believe as Blatsky believed! See Satan and his will always turn God's word 180 degrees out of phase!
Hort, a member of a SECRET SOCIETY yet he found time to attend meetings of various societies, and in June joined the mysterious company of the "Apostles". He remained always a grateful and loyal member of the secret Club, which has now more [ca. 1896] become famous for the member of distinguished men who have belonged to it. In his time the club was in a manner reinvigorated, and he was mainly responsible for the wording of the oath which binds the members to a conspiracy of silence
." "The Life and Letters of Fenton John Anthony Hort," Vol1.p170-171.
Now can YOU reader, see the problem, this Hort who believes that God is evil, and Satan is good, re-writing the Bible for the world, can that be a good thing? YES or NO?
Are you beginning to see, why I say there's a powerful movement, under way since the 1840's to remove Jesus Christ's Divinity as well as His position from the Holy Bile, and Place Mary in His stead? A Woman can never have the same levels of status as a man in all but the Judio-Christian Faiths, of the remaining religions of men? Christ to them and the One World Religion/Government, all must be equal, and none more important than any other, ECUMENICAL MOVEMENTS DEMANDS CHRIST ROLE TO BE REDUCED TO BE EQUAL TO BUDDHA OR VISHNU OR MATRIAS!
Note: If any are still in doubts about Hort believed read on:
1854 Hort to Rev. John Ellerton on Roman Catholic doctrine of purgatory.
"I agree with you in thinking it a pity that Maurice verbally repudiates purgatory, {a non-existing in the Bible a semi-hell (?) for punishments until sins are "Paid for"}but I fully and unwaveringly agree with him in the three cardinal points of the controversy: [1] that eternity is independent of duration: [2] that the power of repentance is not limited to this life; [3] that it is not revealed whether or not all will ultimately repent. The modern n denial of the second has, I suppose, had more to do with the desprititualizing of theology then almost anything that could be named." Ibid p.275
This is Catholic Doctrines!
QUESTION: IF [and He so fully did so] Christ paid for all sins, for all times by His death on the Cross, why do we also need to be punished for sins, unless they doubt Christ paid the price?
Life Vol 1p.322 HORT ON ATONEMENT;
"I THIN, I MENTIONED TO YOU BEFORE CAMPBELL' S BOOK ON THE ATONEMENT WHICH IS INVALUABLE AS FAR AS IT GOES; BUT UNLUCKILY HE KNOWS NOTHING EXCEPT PROTESTANT THEOLOGY.
Note: This man Hort is a Jesuit thus hold to the Universal Church's doctrines. Sins repented by cash or works or both.
Note: eternity in the Bible is forever, and has no duration. Death closes all the books of Heaven for that person, there is no power to repent for the dead because repentance requires though and action, both beyond the reach of the dead!
Not revealed if all will repent, or not?
Revelation 22:12. "And, behold, I come quickly; and my reward is with me, to give every man according as his work shall be."
Revelation 22:11. "He that is unjust, let him be unjust still: and he which is filthy, let him be filthy still: and he that is righteous, let him be righteous still: and he that is holy, let him be holy still."
Note: Many have and shall reject Christ, and they are lost!
Matthew 5:22. "But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire."
Now all those who follow these doctrines of men believing they are Biblical read this:
Matthew 15:9. "But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men" Mark. 7:7 as well.
Matthew 7:20-23 . "Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them. Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works"
" And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity."
1860 Oct. 15th Hort to Westcott Life Vol 1p. 430
"I entirely agree correcting one word, with what you say there on the Atonement, having for many years believed that "The absolute union of the Christian [ or rather, of man] with Christ Himself" is the spiritual truth of which the popular doctrine of substitution is an immoral and material counterfeit. Certainly nothing can he more unscriptural that the modern limiting of
Christ's bearing our sins and sufferings to His death; but indeed that is only one aspect of an almost universal heresy."
Note:By Hort's own words, the fact that Jesus Christ died for our sins, to make Salvation possible, is an immoral doctrine? What's your view?
Romans 5:17. "For if by one man's offence death reigned by one; much more they which receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness shall reign in life by one, Jesus Christ." [also 5: 15,19.
NOTE: These three verses carry the same message, Christ paid in full all sin for all time, but to Hort this is heresy???! is he not also saying that in Christ we become God? Who else teaches that? Mithraism ? the Jesuits? the Freemasons or the Bible? Well Bible does NOT!
Note: Is this not what the Templar Knights were accused of, "Spitting on the Cross"? but of course please remember, in the Public for public consumption, the Vatican stands against all Secret Societies, right? Yet in secret they fully support and direct their actions!
NOTE: Can you not help but to see, that these are the very people, whom have been very instrumental creating the documents upon which ALL modern Bibles are based? Yet how question the fact that no NEW VERSION?TRANSLATION since 1900, is worthy to be called the Word of God, because it's the words of men!
1860, Aug. 14th letter to B.F. Westcott by Hort.
"It is of course true that we can only know God through human forms, but then I think the whole Bible echoes the language of Genesis 1:27 and so assures u8s that human forms are divine forms."
Genesis 1:27. "So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them."
NOTE: "...in the image of God": Now what is an image, a duplicate, or as what we see in a mirror? Yes we see self, in a mirror, but is the image YOU as in fact, or only a mirror projection? In other words does your image become the actual YOU in the flesh? Of course not, when you remove the mirror you also remove your image. so how under heaven does that make us divine? Me thinks Hort is just too full of self!
2 Thessalonians 2:10-12. "And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness."
Note: Does this not tell even the dullest pencil in the box, that God knew this stuff would be coming? Just read this whole chapter and learn!
NOTE: WHO teaches this?
Genesis 3:3-5. "But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die. And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die: For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil."
Note: Satan teaches this stuff, and the main reason why most Christians believe die and go to heaven instantly, yet they have not ever read Scriptures of Lazarus nor .....
John 11:43 . "And when he thus had spoken, he cried with a loud voice, Lazarus, come forth."
Many know this fact, that Lazarus had been in the tomb for 4 days, but did Jesus say "Come down"? NO!
Did He say, " Come Up"? NO, Jesus said come out! Now please follow this, If Lazarus had been in heave for those four days:
A; was he in heaven for 4 days yet still all wrapped up in funeral wrappings , what no knifes there?
B. Would being in heaven for 4 days, and then suddenly find yourself back in this sin pit, would he have been a happy camper?
C. Acts 2:29. "Men and brethren, let me freely speak unto you of the patriarch David, that he is both dead and buried, and his sepulchre is with us unto this day."
D. Will you take the word of God, or the many wrong words of men?
Matthew 6:24. "No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon"
Note: "....serve God and mammon" or money or stuff that money can buy, but can also be extended to be serve/worship God and not man! {at one time the Pope made a German Prince kneel and kiss his foot for forgiveness! Yet all who visit any Pope, MUST bow and kiss his ring, yet today, that's worship!
1 John 5:7-8. "For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one. And there are three that bear witness in earth, the Spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one."
NOTE: You can search high and low for this in any "NEW" Bible the N.A. the N.I.V. and you'll not ever find it 1 John5:7 in any of them revised since 1900! WHY? So they can be gods!
Note: Now you know the why all water shall become as the blood of a dead man coagulated, because this Horn power, this kingdom butchered millions in their "Believe as I say, or die" during the Dark Ages!
Revelation 16:3. "And the second angel poured out his vial upon the sea; and it became as the blood of a dead man: and every living soul died in the sea"
Revelation 16:4. "And the third angel poured out his vial upon the rivers and fountains of waters; and they became blood."
Note: No drinking water anywhere for those who stand against Christ, plus what happened to international trade, by ships, driving through this as thick a mud?
But what about those who stand with Christ?
Isaiah 33:16. "He shall dwell on high: his place of defense shall be the munitions of rocks: bread shall be given him; his waters shall be sure."
Amos 8:11. "Behold, the days come, saith the Lord GOD, that I will send a famine in the land, not a famine of bread, nor a thirst for water, but of hearing the words of the LORD:"
Note: Not a famine of bread nor water, but of hearing truth, the truth of God's word, and MOST Christians are NOT taught much of God's Truth, and many outright lies! Such as found in Gen. 3:4-5.by Satan
Now before you holler, well IF God makes them to this by "I will send a famine, not of bread but of truth, how can He then Punish? Most of the us know where to find God's truth, in His unadulterated Word, and so do all these who teach men' s garbage! Plus all have a free-will and can thereby chose whom they serve God or Satan! They are the ONLY choices! Refusing to either means choosing Satan by default!
Now IF you still have doubts about whether all this speaks to Biblical Doctrine or Catholic Doctrine read the following letter:
Life, Vol 2pp.49-51 Oct. 17th Hort t0 Westcott:
..." I have been persuaded for many years that Mary Worship and "Jesus' worship have very much in common in their causes and their results. Perhaps the whole question may be said to be involved in the true idea of mediation, which is almost universally corrupted in or both of the two opposite directions. On the one hand we speak and think as if there were no real bringing near, such as the NT tells of, but only an interpretation between two permanently distant objects, on the other we condemn all secondary human mediation injurious to the one, and shut our eyes to the indestructible fact of existing human mediation which is found everywhere. But this last error can hardly be expelled till Protestants unlearn the crazy horror of the idea of Priesthood"
Note:Who is pushing for Mary worship, so far other than the Universal Church, in Rome? Do they not hold that both Mary and Christ are our mediators before God? Is this Catholic or Biblical Doctrine?
1 Timothy 2:. " For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus;"
NOTE: Is the above just another "Throw-away verse"?
Life Vol1pp 251,252. 1865 Sept 27th - Westcott:
"I have been trying to recall my impressions of La Salette (Note A Mariam shrine) I wish I could see to what forgotten truth Mariolatry bears witess; and how we can practically set forth the teachings of the miracles".
Nov 17th Westcott to Rev. Benson.
"As far as I could judge, the "Idea" of La Salette was that of God revealing Himself now, and not in one form but in many."
Note: does this but in many bespeak of all human made religions of earth the ecumenical movement? Yet does the following Hort letter not bring to mind that awful story of how to boil a frog? Cast a frog into a pot of hot water, and it'll jump right out, but place one on warm water that's slowly heated to a biol and the from will stray put until it dies?
Life Vol1. p.400 Hort to Rev. Rowland Williams 1858 Oct. 21st.
"there are, I fear, still more serious differences between us on the subject of authority, and especially the authority of thy Bible.... If this primary objection were removed, and I could feel our differences to be only of degree. I should still hesitate to take part in the proposed scheme.... The errors and prejudices, which we agree in wishing to remove, can surely be more wholesomely and also more effectually reached by individual efforts of an indirect kind that by combined open assault. At present very many orthodox but rational men are being unawares acted upon by influences which will assuredly bear good fruit in due time if its allowed to go quietly; but I fear that a premature crisis would frighten back many into the merest traditionalism."
NOTE: If, you take the K.J.V and open it in the very middle of Acts, then from that point to the very end end of Revelations, is the same amount of words the N.I.V. has left out!
Luke 4:4. "And Jesus answered him, saying, It is written, That man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word of God."
NOTE: If your Church leaders use these so called NEW Bibles, ask them to tell you what the above verse means, in view of Rev,22:18-19?
Revelation 22:18-19. "For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book."
Now if you dear reader, think or are under the impression that one word added or removed will not make much of a difference, please note:
Genesis 3:3. "But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die"
Genesis 3:4 And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:
NOTE: Still think one word added or deleted, makes no difference?
It makes a life or death difference, both shall be eternal!!! Here's just how diabolically clever Satan brings his servant to be......
Life, pp. 138-139
1870 Hort: "It is quite impossible to judge the value of what appear to be TRIFLING ALTERATIONS by merely reading them one after the other. Taken together, they have often important bearings which few would think of at first... The difference between a picture of say Raffaelle and a feeble copy of it is made up of a number of trivial differences .We have successfully ressisted being warned off dangerous ground, where the needs of revision required that it should not be shirked. It is, one can hardly doubt, the beginning of a new period in Church history. So far the angry objectors have reason for their astonishment." [emphasis are mine]
Note: I ask you is the removing of all the words equal fro 1/2 way of Acts too the end of Revelations to be thought of as TRIFLING? What do you think?
The following are from a book, "Which Bible" by Dr. David Otis Fuller:
Hort writes to Rev. Rowland Williams. Oct 21, 1858.
"Further I agree with them {Authors of essays and reviews] in condemning many leading specif doctrines of the popular theology . Evangelicals seem to me perverted rather than untrue. There are, I fear, still more serious differences between us on the subject of authority, and especially the authority of the Bible."
Note: that show you where Hort comes from now look to Westcott.
Westcott writes from France to fiancee in 1847. "After leaving the monastery we shaped our course to a little oratory which we discovered on the summit of neighboring hill. Fortunately we found the door open. It is very small, with one kneeling=place; and behind a scree was a "Pieta" the size of life 9i.e. a Virgin and dead Christ)... Had I been along I could have knelt there for hours."
March 4, 1890 Westcott to the Archbishop of Canterbury, on the Old Testament criticism. "No one I suppose holds that the first three chapters of Genesis, for example give a literal history. I could never underatand how anyone reading them with open eyes could think they did."
NOTE: If they do NOT believe the first three chapter of the Holy Bible, are they then not also saying I do NOT believe any of it?
I guess he never learned that Christ arose from the tomb, the first morning after the He rested on the Sabbath in the earth.!If these two men Hort and Westcott were not full fledged Jesuits, I eat my hat as they say!
Hort to Westcott- Sept. 23 1864. "I remember shocking you and Lightfoot not so long ago by expressing a belief that Protestantism is only parenthetical and temporary "Perfect Catholicity ", has been nowhere since the Reformation"
Note: is there still any doubts about whom these these labored for but the Rome? No not its laity but its leadership!
NEXT: The New Age Agenda! [Sorry there's nothing "new" about it, most of it came from Babylon!]
Comments or Questions?
servant@frontier.com
john
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment